ࡱ> _a\]^%` Ebjbjٕ eE,,,,,,,tDDDD\,Y$hwP,,,,,6,, pZtD, )0Y>8,@h@J< YDD,,,,,, Dr. John M. Denison S.S. History Department 2008 PHILOSOPHY [HZT4U] ISU OVERVIEW ESSAY TOPIC SEMINAR TOPIC Stage 1: Formative AssessmentMarksStage 1: Formative AssessmentMarks Research notes and theses proposals for the essayKnowledge 10 Thinking/Inquiry 10 Research notesKnowledge 10 Thinking/Inquiry 10 Opposing Viewpoints - see chart - philosophers with their relevant ideas organized under them - key ideas and quotations Knowledge 10 Application 10 Opposing Viewpoints - see chart - philosophers with their relevant ideas organized under them - key ideas and quotations Knowledge 10 Application 10  Deadline: ________________________________ Deadline: ___________________________ Stage 2: Formative AssessmentMarksStage 2: Formative Assessment Marks Annotated Bibliography of resourcesApplication 10 Communication 10 Annotated Bibliography of resourcesApplication 10 Communication 10 Research notes extensiveKnowledge 20 Thinking/Inquiry 10Research notes extensive + - current & relevant article of interest to be used in the seminarKnowledge 20 Thinking/Inquiry 10Essay Outline: - see chart Key Arguments for your essay - list the arguments with main ideas, explaining the proofs to be used - refer to philosophers/ quotations - provide objections & rebuttal Thinking/Inquiry 10 Communication 10 Application 10Essay Outline: - see chart Key Arguments for your essay - list the arguments with main ideas, explaining the proofs to be used - refer to philosophers/ quotations - provide objections & rebuttal  Thinking/Inquiry 10 Communication 10 Application 10  Deadline: ________________________________ Deadline: ___________________________ Stage 3: Summative EvaluationMarksStage 3: Summative Evaluation Marks Stage 2 - must include all research, all stages 80 Stage 2 - must include all research, all stages 80 Finished essay in good copy marking sheets - unannotated bibliography 80 Seminar - in class presentation, refer to a current article, discussion questions - class handout for the seminar 80 Date Due:________________________________ Date Due:_________________________ Philosophy: Questions and Theories [HZT4U] ISU Research Stage 1 Formative Assessment and Final Evaluation of Essay and Seminar Research Notes: 10 marks Knowledge + 10 marks Thinking/inquiry must be in point form in your own words. If you are quoting a source, you will cite the page number in brackets all bibliographic information must be noted at the top of the 1st page of notes or be on an attached library square notes should be categorized in the margin once finished, to identify how they relate to your topic * to be good, you will have moved beyond encyclopedia and Internet dependence Possible Essay Theses Questions OR Seminar positions: you must consider what philosophical questions you might ask on the topic which philosophers have written on this topic or have a relevant viewpoint? Suggest 2-3 for each side of the topic Example: Is there a single human nature St. Augustine or Plato vs. Existentialist Sartre or materialist Hobbes 2. Opposing Viewpoints Chart 10 marks Knowledge + 10 marks Application this is a summary of the information you have found so far but organized under key philosophers and headings which useful key ideas and quotations for the topic this will illustrate the depth of your understanding of the facts gathered so far include a) reference to the source of all primary sources (acknowledge page) b) headings for all of the philosophers your notes describe c) a last heading of your own thoughts on the topic, insights, questions * aim for 2-3 pages Stage 2 Formative Assessment and Final Evaluation 1. Annotated Bibliography: 10 marks Application + 10 marks Communication this is the alphabetical listing of every resource used in your research after each reference used, you will include a brief description of the book and explain its usefulness/relevance (or not) to your research Example: Velasquez, Manuel. Philosophy: a Text with Readings 8th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 2002. A new philosophy text that provided a chapter overview of the concept of "human nature". It gave useful background that helped to define the issue, and an introductory summary of Hobbes and Plato. It gave some primary source that has pointed me in the direction of "free will" that I will now further research. A very good place to begin. Stage 2 contd 2. Extensive Research Notes: 20 marks Knowledge + 10 marks Thinking/inquiry this time they must be extensive and clearly indicate your depth of information you will now have used encyclopedia, internet, books and journal articles, You will clearly show primary source. Lots!! You will now have well researched, differing opinions on the topic ESSAY/SEMINAR Outline: 10 marks Thinking/inquiry + 10 marks Communication + 10 marks Application Although this is not your finished essay, it should clearly lay out what it will include: 2 pages in length, it will be in point form headings as shown below that represent each of the paragraphs you will use in your essay cite the sources of quotations or stats Example: Introduction: - thesis statement the point of view you will prove and argue in the essay - what philosophical viewpoint you support - set out the topics (premises) that you are using 1 topic for each argument paragraph Topic - Premise # 1 - argue the 2nd most important proof for your view on the topic - note any special terms, definitions used, assumptions - provide quotation excerpts and brief facts in support (you may use imbedded style citations here) Topic - Premise # 2 - as above (weakest premise) Topic - Premise # 3 - as above (strongest premise) Objections - present the major philosophical objections & criticisms to your thesis - provide quotations from philosophers and brief facts in support Discussion -give your response to these objections, clarifying your thesis - make reference to current examples Conclusion - restate your thesis and outline the reasons for supporting it rather than the opponents SEMINAR NOTE: You will have included & highlighted a current article that illustrates your topic You will show how it will be used in the seminar to start discussion Stage 3 Formative Assessment and Final Evaluation The finished Essay 80 marks in all areas of the achievement chart 1500-2000 words, typed & double spaced Include a title page with your name, teacher, essay title, date all Stage 1 and 2 pieces that will now be given a final evaluation with the marking sheets the use of formal footnotes at the bottom of a page or a 2nd to last page of numbered endnotes. For all direct quotations, all ideas lifted from an author, statistics and any questionable dates, you must acknowledge sources. a revised (not annotated) and complete bibliography of all sources used in the research. This is the last page of the essay. the marking scheme sheet, that you have checked over numerous times to know how this essay is going to be marked. *in other words, give me everything! Stage 3 Formative Assessment and Final Evaluation The Seminar 80 marks in all areas of the achievement chart You will begin with a 2-3 minute introduction that states what your position is on the topic you are to discuss Each participant will do this, then 1 person will explain and defend his/her position. Approximately 15 minutes for each defense. The second person will do the same. Prepared discussion questions will then be addressed by the participants to each other. The debate begins! Class Handout A concise summary of your position and major factual/philosophical points of defense it will detail your argument clearly laying out each premise it will cite specific primary sources you will use as proof of your & other's thinking on the topic. be precise, yet clear in your explanations of what you believe The teacher will photocopy the class handout if it is received by 8:00 am the morning of the presentation. Discuss a relevant and current article of interest written in the past year that raises the topic you are discussing. Dr. John M. Denison S. S. History Department Philosophy: Questions and Theories [HZT4U] Student Name____________________________________ ISU STAGE 1 / 40 marks CategoryLevel 4 80 -100 %Level 3 70-79 %Level 2 60-69 %Level 1 50-59% NOTES Knowledge and Understanding Formative / 10  *more than 6 sources, including books, internet, encyclopediae *sources attached to all notes *excellent number & selection of philosopher quotations *quotations are documented *In own words, categorized by topics used in the chart 10 9 8 *5-6 sources, including books, internet, and encyclopediae *sources attached to all notes *very good number and selection of philosopher quotations *quotations are documented *In own words, categorized by topics used in the chart 7 *3-4 sources do not provide full coverage of the topic *most notes are sourced *some quotations & stats are not documented *some good philosopher quotations provided *some notes are not in your own words and show only some topic understanding 6 *superficial as encyclopedia dependent, weak sources * all notes are not sourced *quotations & stats are not documented or are too few *few or no philosopher quotations included *limited understanding of the topic is shown as too much is not in your words *many highlighted articles 5NOTES Thinking and Inquiry Formative / 10  *excellent depth & selection of resources illustrates exceptional research strategies *excellent selection of philosophers/writers found so far who illustrate both sides of the topic *excellent topic questions suggested for the essay show effective critical thinking 10 9 8 *good depth & selection of resources show effective research strategies *very good selection of philosophers/writers found so far who illustrate both sides of the topic *very good topic questions suggested for the essay show considerable critical thinking 7 *adequate depth & selection of resources show some research skill *good selection of philosophers/writers found so far who illustrate both sides of the topic *good topic questions are suggested for the essay show some moderate critical thinking 6 *lack of depth & good selection of resources show limited research skills *limited selection of philosophers/writers found does not clearly illustrate both sides of the topic *topic questions suggested for the essay show limited critical thinking 5VIEWPOINTS CHART Knowledge and Understanding Formative / 10  *Precise, detailed and accurate information *excellent selection of philosophers/writers used *terms and concepts defined already show exceptional topic knowledge * ideas explained and quotations used illustrate an excellent foundation 10 9 8 *Precise, and accurate information *very good selection of philosophers/writers used *terms and concepts defined already show considerable topic knowledge *ideas explained and quotations used illustrate a very good foundation for ISU topic 7 *good, accurate information *good selection of philosophers/writers used for organization *terms and concepts defined show some topic knowledge * ideas explained and quotations used illustrate a weak foundation for the ISU topic 6 *limited information *inaccuracies present *weak selection of philosophers/writers used for organization *research shows only one side of the argument *terms and concepts defined show limited topic knowledge * ideas explained and quotations used illustrate a limited foundation for the ISU topic 5CHART Application Formative / 10  *excellent chart format *makes connections with a high degree of effectiveness *documentation is precise within the chart *last heading My thoughts - the questions raised about the research done so far show excellent insight - excellent ability to apply philosophical terms, ideas, etc. is illustrated 10 9 8 *very good chart format *makes connections with considerable effectiveness *documentation is precise within the chart *last heading My thoughts - the questions raised about the research done so far show very good insight - considerable ability to apply philosophical terms, ideas, etc. is illustrated 7 *good chart format *makes connections with moderate effectiveness *some documentation within the chart *last heading My thoughts - the questions raised about the research done so far show some insight - some ability to apply philosophical terms, ideas, etc. is illustrated 6 *weak chart format *makes connections with limited effectiveness *may lack documentation within the chart *last heading My thoughts - the questions raised about the research done so far show limited insight - limited ability to apply philosophical terms, ideas, etc. is illustrated 5 Note: A student whose achievement is below Level 1 (50%) has not met the expectations for this assignment OPPOSING PHILOSOPHICAL VIEWPOINTS CHART: Stage 1 Topic: PhilosophersKey ideasQuotationsPosition        Dr. John M. Denison S. S. History Department Philosophy: Questions and Theories [HZT4U] Student Name____________________________________ / 80 ESSAY ISU STAGE 2 CategoryLevel 4 80 -100 %Level 3 70-79 %Level 2 60-69 %Level 1 50-59% NOTES Knowledge and Understanding Formative / 20 Final Mark / 20 *more than 8 sources, including books, internet, encyclopediae *evident new research that broadens & completes the necessary topic knowledge *sources with all notes *excellent number & selection of philosopher quotations *quotations are documented *In own words, categorized 20 19 18 17 16 *7-8 sources, including books, internet, and encyclopediae *evident new research that broadens & the necessary topic knowledge *sources with all notes *very good number and selection of philosopher quotations *quotations are documented *In own words, categorized 15 14 *6-7 sources do not provide full coverage of the topic *some useful, new research is evident *most notes are sourced *some quotations & stats are not documented *some good philosopher quotations provided *some notes are not in your own words and show only some topic understanding 13 12 *superficial as too few /one sources have been used *no notes for some sources * all notes are not sourced *quotations & stats are not documented or are too few *few or no philosopher quotations included *limited understanding of the topic is shown as too much is not in your words *only highlighted articles 11 10NOTES Thinking and Inquiry Formative / 10 Final Mark / 10*excellent depth & selection of resources illustrates exceptional research strategies *excellent selection of philosophers/writers found who illustrate both sides of the topic *excellent quotations found *highly effective critical thinking is illustrated that reflects several different philosophical positions*good depth & selection of resources show effective research strategies *very good selection of philosophers/writers found who illustrate both sides of the topic *very good quotations found *considerable critical thinking is illustrated that reflects several different philosophical positions on the topic*adequate depth & selection of resources show some research skill *good selection of philosophers/writers found who illustrate both sides of the topic *some quotations found *some moderate critical thinking is illustrated that reflects some knowledge of possible philosophical positions on the topic*lack of depth & good selection of resources show limited research skills *limited selection of philosophers/writers found does not clearly illustrate both sides of the topic *few/no quotations found *limited critical thinking is illustrated that reflects limited knowledge of the possible philosophical positions on the topicAnnotated Bibliography Application /10 Final / 10 Communication /10 Final / 10*Exceptional variety of sources *All formats are correct *Clear, insightful comments show excellent command of the topic*Very good variety of sources *Most formats are correct, minor errors may exist *Clear, well written comments show very good command of the topic*Good sources *Some errors in format *Comments show good command of the topic *May lack sufficient analysis of your sources*Weak sources used *Many errors in format *Comments show some command of the topic *Lacks sufficient analysis of your sourcesEssay Outline Communication Formative / 10 Final Mark / 10 Thinking and Inquiry Formative / 10 Final Mark / 10 Application Formative / 10 Final Mark / 10*Precise, detailed and accurate information *thesis is precise, arguable *excellent selection of topics used for organization * excellent, precise examples used and documented to illustrate points made within the outline *selection of writers used show exceptional topic insight and critical thinking *an exceptional argument is made that provides an excellent analysis of philosophers and ideas *precisely follows the format suggested *excellent logical flow of argument illustrated *covers all areas *shows excellent insight 10 9 8*Precise, and accurate information *thesis is precise, arguable *very good selection of topics used for organization *used very good, precise examples, well documented within the outline *terms and concepts used show considerable topic insight and critical thinking *a very good argument is made that provides a strong analysis of philosophers and ideas *effectively follows the format suggested *very good logical flow of argument illustrated *shows very good insight *considerable ability to apply philosophical terms, ideas, etc. is illustrated 7*good, accurate information *thesis needs refinement *good selection of topics used for organization *moderately effective use of examples & documentation within the outline *terms and concepts used show some topic insight and critical thinking *a good argument is made that provides some analysis of philosophers and ideas *some ability to follow the format suggested *logical lapses may exist in the argument *shows some insight *some ability to apply philosophical terms, ideas, etc. is illustrated 6*limited information *inaccuracies present *thesis needs refinement *weak selection of topics used for organization *lack of examples and proper documentation within the outline show limited insight into the topic *terms and concepts defined show limited topic insight or critical thinking a weak argument is made that provides a limited analysis of philosophers and ideas *no objections or rebuttal *limited ability to follow the format suggested *limited logical flow *limited ability to apply philosophical terms, ideas, etc. is illustrated 5Note: A student whose achievement is below Level 1 (50%) has not met the expectations for this assignment Dr. John M. Denison S. S. History Department Philosophy: Questions and Theories [HZT4U] Student Name____________________________________ / 80 SEMINAR STAGE 2 CategoryLevel 4 80 -100 %Level 3 70-79 %Level 2 60-69 %Level 1 50-59% NOTES Knowledge and Understanding Formative / 20 Final Mark / 20*more than 8 sources, including books, internet, encyclopediae *evident new research that broadens & completes the necessary topic knowledge *sources with all notes *excellent number & selection of philosopher quotations *quotations are documented *In own words, categorized 20 - 16*7-8 sources, including books, internet, and encyclopediae *evident new research that broadens & the necessary topic knowledge *sources with all notes *very good number and selection of philosopher quotations *quotations are documented *In own words, categorized 15 14*6-7 sources do not provide full coverage of the topic *some useful, new research is evident *most notes are sourced *some quotations & stats are not documented *some good philosopher quotations provided *some notes are not in your own words and show only some topic understanding 13 12*superficial as too few /one sources have been used *no notes for some sources * all notes are not sourced *quotations & stats are not documented or are too few *few or no philosopher quotations included *limited understanding of the topic is shown as too much is not in your words *only highlighted articles 11 10NOTES Thinking and Inquiry Formative / 10 Final Mark / 10*excellent depth & selection of resources illustrates exceptional research strategies *excellent selection of philosophers/writers found who illustrate both sides of the topic *effective critical thinking has been illustrated *has included an excellent highlighted current article*good depth & selection of resources show effective research strategies *very good selection of philosophers/writers found so far who illustrate both sides of the topic *considerable critical thinking has been shown *has included a very good highlighted current article *adequate depth & selection of resources show some research skill *good selection of philosophers/writers found so far who illustrate both sides of the topic *some moderate critical thinking has been shown *has included a good highlighted current article *lack of depth & good selection of resources show limited research skills *limited selection of philosophers/writers found does not clearly illustrate both sides of the topic *limited critical thinking has been shown *has included a current article - may not be a good choice, may lack analysisAnnotated Bibliography Application /10 Final / 10 Communication /10 Final / 10*Exceptional variety of sources *All formats are correct *Clear, insightful comments show excellent command of the topic*Very good variety of sources *Most formats are correct, minor errors may exist *Clear, well written comments show very good command of the topic*Good sources *Some errors in format *Comments show good command of the topic *May lack sufficient analysis of your sources*Weak sources used *Errors in format *Comments show some command of the topic *Lacks sufficient analysis of your sourcesSeminar Chart Communication Formative / 10 Final Mark / 10 Thinking and Inquiry Formative / 10 Final Mark / 10 Application Formative / 10 Final Mark / 10*Precise, detailed and accurate information *thesis is precise, arguable *excellent selection of topics used for organization * excellent, precise examples used and documented to illustrate points made within the outline *selection of writers used show exceptional topic insight and critical thinking *an exceptional argument is made that provides an excellent analysis of philosophers and ideas *precisely follows the format suggested *excellent logical flow of argument illustrated *covers all areas *shows excellent insight 10 9 8*Precise, and accurate information *thesis is precise, arguable *very good selection of topics used for organization *used very good, precise examples, well documented within the outline *terms and concepts used show considerable topic insight and critical thinking *a very good argument is made that provides a strong analysis of philosophers and ideas *effectively follows the format suggested *very good logical flow of argument illustrated *show very good insight *considerable ability to apply philosophical terms, ideas, etc. is illustrated 7*good, accurate information *thesis needs refinement *good selection of topics used for organization *moderately effective use of examples & documentation within the outline *terms and concepts used show some topic insight and critical thinking *a good argument is made that provides some analysis of philosophers and ideas *some ability to follow the format suggested *logical lapses may exist in the argument *show some insight *some ability to apply philosophical terms, ideas, etc. is illustrated 6*limited information *inaccuracies present *thesis needs refinement *weak selection of topics used for organization *lack of examples and proper documentation within the outline show limited insight into the topic *terms and concepts defined show limited topic insight or critical thinking a weak argument is made that provides a limited analysis of philosophers and ideas *limited ability to follow the format suggested *limited logical flow in the argument *limited ability to apply philosophical terms, ideas, etc. is illustrated 5Note: A student whose achievement is below Level 1 (50%) has not met the expectations for this assignment PHILOSOPHICAL ESSAY/SEMINAR OUTLINE: Stage 2 Thesis: Premise - (point to argue) Philosophers and Key ideas/terms Quotations#1 #2 #3  PHILOSOPHICAL ESSAY/SEMINAR OUTLINE: Stage 2 [cont'd] Thesis:  Philosophers and key ideas QuotationsObjections to my thesis Discussion - response to objection - current examples Conclusion  Dr. John M. Denison S. S. History Department 2004 Philosophy: Questions and Theories [HZT4U] Student___________________________________ Essay Mark / 80 CategoriesLevel 4 80 - 100 %Level 3 70-79 %Level 2 60-69 %Level 1 50-59 % Thesis Development Thinking and Inquiry / 20*Clear, insightful position on the topic is stated *Excellent, precise philosophical details provided that argue the thesis *Logical, well organized summary of proofs in support using several philosophers for support *very effective critical thinking skills illustrated in objections raised and rebuttal given*Clear position stated on the topic *Very good philosophical details provided that argue the thesis *Logical, well organized summary of proofs in support using several philosophers for support * minor errors in logic but considerable critical thinking skills are illustrated in objections raised and rebuttal given*Position stated on the topic, but it needs clarification or is not arguable *thesis needs emphasis throughout *Good philosophical details provided but not fully developed *Organized summary of proofs in support, but lapses exist *some use of critical thinking *paragraph of objections or rebuttal to the thesis is not fully developed*Position lacks depth of thinking *No position stated *Some philosophical details provided but may lack focus, logic *Summary of proofs in support is not well organized to develop thesis *little analysis is made showing limited critical thinking *no objections are raised and discussed *no rebuttal provided20 - 1615 - 1413 - 1211 - 10 Content accuracy: Knowledge and Understanding / 20*Facts are accurate and extremely well used & explained *Evident, excellent use of primary source & reference to current examples *Makes excellent reference to specific philosophers & the topic of discussion *Excellent insight into the topic *Facts are accurate and very well used & explained *Evident use of primary source *Makes very good comparison between philosophers & the topic of discussion *Shows considerable insight into the topic *Facts are mostly accurate but not always well used & explained *Some use of primary source and reference to current examples *Connections made between philosophers & the topic show some insight *Facts may be inaccurate and/or not well used & explained *Some use of primary source and reference to current examples *Connections made between philosophers & the topic show limited insightUse of: quotations Bibliography Philosophical reasoning Application / 20 *excellent selection of quotations used as proofs *evident use of primary and secondary sources *bibliography shows a wide variety of sources used in research *all formats are correct *excellent use of philosophical terms and methods of analysis*very good selection of quotations *evident use of primary and secondary sources *bibliography shows a variety of sources used in research *minor errors in bibliography or in citations may exist *effective use of philosophical terms and methods of analysis*could improve the number & quality of resources used *some use of primary and secondary sources *some errors in citation or bibliography *moderately effective use of philosophical terms and methods of analysis*selection of resources used provide only limited analysis of the topic *may be no citation of philosophical opinion or current references *may have no bibliography present *many errors in format *shows limited knowledge of philosophical terms and methods of analysis10 - 8765 Organization: - Intro & conclusion - Paragraphing Communication / 10* excellent intro & conclusion *paragraphing is skillful and logical *excellent analysis is made throughout the essay *paragraphs of insightful objections and separate rebuttal are provided*good intro and conclusion but *may lack some originality *no major paragraph errors *flow of ideas is smooth *may contain minor errors *very good separate objections and rebuttal are provided*intro or conclusion is weak *some paragraphing errors as ideas are not developed *paragraph transitions are stilted and mechanical as weak or no topic / concluding sentences *some objections and rebuttal of thesis is made *introduction & conclusion are missing or weak *lack of proper paragraphing *illogical grouping of ideas *paragraphs are not connected *no objections are raised to the thesis *no separate paragraph of objections and rebuttal are providedStyle & Mechanics: - Use of words - Sentence Structure - Spelling & grammar Communication / 10  *sophisticated style *effective & varied language *almost error free *error free *Highly effective communication skills *word choice is precise and appropriate showing effective communication skills *correct use of sentence structure *some minor errors *few major errors *wording shows some effective choices and communication skills *errors in sentence structure *several major errors or many minor errors in spelling or in grammar*language used is limited in its effectiveness *poor or imprecise wording *awkward, simplistic or lack of knowledge of proper sentencing *too many errors in spelling and/or grammar that detract Note: A student whose achievement is below Level 1 (50%) has not met the expectations for this assignment Dr. John M. Denison S. S. History Department Philosophy: Questions and Theories [HZT4U] Student Name____________________________________ Seminar Mark / 80 CategoryLevel 4 80 -100 %Level 3 70-79 %Level 2 60-69 %Level 1 50-59%  Hand out Knowledge and Understanding / 10 Communication / 10 *Clear, insightful position on the topic is stated *Excellent, precise philosophical details provided *Logical, well organized summary of proofs in support *Excellent, brief facts given *Use of primary source evident and well documented 10 9 8 *Clear position stated on the topic *Very good philosophical details provided *Logical, well organized summary of proofs in support *Very good facts given *Use of primary source evident and documented 7 *Position stated on the topic, but it needs clarification *Good philosophical details provided *Organized summary of proofs in support, but lapses exist *Good use of facts given *Some primary source evident *Weakness in 1 area above 6 *Position stated on the topic, but it lacks depth of thinking *Some philosophical details provided *Summary of proofs in support is not well organized *Use of facts lacks depth *May lack primary source, may not be documented *Weakness in several areas above 5 Seminar Content Knowledge and Understanding / 10 Application / 20 *Excellent selection of material *Shows great topic insight *Makes excellent connections between philosophers & the topic of discussion *Facts are accurate and extremely well used & explained *Evident & excellent use of primary source *excellent current article(s) referenced *15-20 minute presentation 20 - 16 *Very good choice of material *Insights need refinement *Makes very good connections between philosophers & the topic of discussion *Facts are accurate and very well used & explained *Evident & excellent use of primary source *very good current article(s) referenced *15-20 minute presentation 15 - 14 *Good choice of material, but some areas were weak *Connections made between philosophers & the topic of discussion were weak in places *Facts are accurate but not always well used & explained, needs length *Did not provide a clear understanding of the issue *Some use of primary source *good article referenced 13 - 12 *Poor choices in some areas *Connections between the topic philosophers show lack of depth of research *Facts are not always accurate, well used & explained *Did not provide a clear understanding of the issue *Poor use of primary source *poor article or no article *presentation is too short in length 11 - 10Presentation Thinking and Inquiry / 20 Communication / 10  *Focused, clearly and logically presented and argued *Excellent preparation evident *Excellent participation in the discussion illustrates command of the issue and its philosophical aspects 20 - 16 *Clear, audible, well paced - use of emphasis of key ideas is evident *Excellent participation in discussion *Thoughtful questions asked on the current article & of your opponent * Audience is engaged. We were convinced! 10 9 8 *Clear, logical argument provided *Very well prepared *Participation in the discussion illustrates considerable command of the issue and its philosophical aspects 15 - 14 *Clear, audible & key points are emphasized *Very good participation in discussion *Very good questions asked on the current article and of your opponent *Audience is engaged 7 *Lapses in logical development *Shows some weakness in preparation *Good participation, difficulties at times responses or questioning shows moderate command of the issue and its philosophical aspects 13 - 12 *May lack clarity or be hard to hear or lack emphasis of key ideas *Some participation in discussion *Some questions asked on the current article and of your opponent 6 *Not logically developed *Shows weakness in seminar preparation *Participation a weakness * Responses to questions show limited command of the issue and its philosophical aspects 11 - 10 *May lack clarity, be hard to hear *Lack of emphasis of key ideas *Not totally committed to the issue *Few questions asked on the current article and of your opponent *No article presented 5Note: A student whose achievement is below Level 1 (50%) has not met the expectations for this assignment 67qr  " 3 L ] k n  # , 5 D G H \ g h N m s  - 0 > Y u   " 3 L M N [ h25CJ h26CJ h2>*CJ h26 h2CJ h25h2 h_CQ5CJ h#5CJ h25CJL7qr$If $$Ifa$$a$$0]0a$$0]0a$ E " 3 M N ] n  lf`ffff`fff$If$Ifkd$$Ifl\ X & T\ T04 la^  " # 4 5 G H lffffffffff$Ifkd$$Ifl\ X & T\ T04 la^ H h f`"]"kd$$Ifl\ X & T\ T04 la^$If K L M N m s UkdI$$Ifl\ VX &  T04 la^$If $$Ifa$]  0 > X Y ckd $$Ifl4\ VX &  T04 la^f4$If Y Z u  " 3 M N ckd$$Ifl4\ VX &  T04 la^f4$If [ ` i ->Xfm~(KQqvxcrHIJK4]c +ε h_CQ6CJh_CQ5>*CJ h2CJH*h256CJh25>*CJ h25CJ h25 h2>*CJh2 h26 h26CJ h2CJDN j ,->Xf%Iklm~ x$If^x$If)*+,KQf`ZXXXO $$Ifa$]]kd$$Ifl\ VX &  T04 la^$If Qpwxy]TT $$Ifa$kda$$Ifl\V!&|Fj04 la$If $$Ifa$ /]S & F$Ifkd$$Ifl\V!&|Fj04 la $$Ifa$$If /0145= $$Ifa$$If HIJljdd^UUPP$a$$]a$"]"0]0kd$$Ifl\V!&|Fj04 la JKU-{iW & F 88]^8 & F 88]^8 & F 8|8]|^8 & F]]kd$$IfTl\04 laT $$Ifa$ -]   ZM+? |p]|^p & F8^8 & F 8"8]"^80]0"]"` & F 88^8"]"+.YMTY+?@AC tuO_~`jkwJR]^lnM U ` O!Y!Z!!!*"9""" h2CJH* h2>*CJ h26CJh25>*CJh2 h25CJh256CJ h2CJO?@ABChuuo8^8 & F 88^8|]|]kd$$IfTl\04 laT $$Ifa$ $^`a$  uvwx*|]| & F|]| & F D^gd_CQ & F & F] >]>^ "]"`"]"V8`ajk6IJ` $ ^$ ` T^T` ^` ]` & F D|]|^gd_CQ & F D^gd_CQ ]^ |]|^` G M  !N!O!!!!"(")"*"8"9"" & F 88]^8gd_CQ^p^p`] p^p`"""""""#####a###}]$a$]kd$$IfTl\04 laT $$Ifa$ & F 8^8gd_CQ""""##)#.#\#^####t$v$z$|$$$ %%%2%>&c&e&f&g&&&&&&&&''s((((4)L)))>*p**++I+i++++,,1,=-\-l.n.v/x/00000íííí h2CJh256CJ h26CJ h25CJh2 h2>*h25>*CJh256CJ h26CJ h2CJH* h25CJ h2CJD###)$8$$ %3%%%=&>&c&d&e&f&g&& $$Ifa$$a$^ `]`^ ]^ ]^ ]^` ]^`&&&&&&&[''.(p(q(r((yss] ^` & F^ & F^`^]kd $$IfTl\04 laT ((!))))<*=*>**++h+i+r+++++$If$]a$ & F8^8 & F h8n8]n^88^8 & F8]^8++++,,,,,,YSSSSSSSS$Ifkd $$Iflr |) 04 la ,,,0,1,2,d,{,,,,,-<-=-\-]-----..4.k.l.n.o.. $$Ifa$$If...../(/u/v/x/y////0060000 $$Ifa$$If0000000000YSSSSSSSS$IfkdE $$Iflr |) 04 la 000000 1,1G1W11127282m2222Q3R3T3U3333 4f4g4 $$Ifa$$If00262R3T3g4h4f5g5h5i5{555556677881:2:3:4:::G:J:W:s:t::;;;N<g<=={=='>(>>>O?P?Q?S??????&@u@@@@AAA$AAAAAA B8CZC}DDEE F$F h~wCJh2 h25CJh256CJ h26CJ h25 h2CJ h2CJ h25CJNg4i4j445d5e5f5h5$If $$Ifa$h5i5t5z5{555555YSSSSSSSS$Ifkd $$Iflr |) 04 la 5555555555-6u6666666667I77777777 $$Ifa$$If778@8]8~8888888 99^999991:3: $$Ifa$$If3:4:::;:G:H:I:J:T:U:WQQQQQQQQ$Ifkd $$Ifl r |) 04 la U:V:W:r:s:t:u:::::`;;;;;<4<N<<= = ==L=a={=='> $$Ifa$$If'>)>*>=>k>>>?O?Q?$If $$Ifa$ Q?R?S???????YWWWRWWW$a$kdG $$Iflr |) 04 la?@@@&@'@(@)@*@+@,@-@fkd $$Ifl\H$fN \ X04 la$If -@.@/@0@1@2@3@4@5@6@7@8@fkd $$Ifl\H$fN \ X04 la$If 8@9@:@;@<@=@>@?@@@A@B@C@fkdm$$Ifl\H$fN \ X04 la$If C@D@E@F@G@H@I@J@K@L@M@N@fkd+$$Ifl\H$fN \ X04 la$If N@O@P@Q@R@S@T@U@V@W@X@Y@fkd$$Ifl\H$fN \ X04 la$If Y@Z@[@\@]@^@_@`@a@b@c@d@fkd$$Ifl\H$fN \ X04 la$If d@e@f@g@h@i@j@k@l@m@n@o@fkde$$Ifl\H$fN \ X04 la$If o@p@q@r@s@t@u@v@@@$Af``^^]kd#$$Ifl\H$fN \ X04 la$If $A-AJAcA}AAAAAASkd$$Iflr |) 04 la$If AAAAAAA BB@BWBBBBCC7CZC[CCCCC/DGDbD}DDD $$Ifa$$IfDDDDE-EGE`EzEEEE F%FBFyFFFFG%G $$Ifa$$If$FG%G&G,GPGGFJGJLLLLL MM1M?MOMsMMMMMNNOO-O/OOOOOOOOOPP%P?PkPlPwPxPPPPQQRRRSTTTTYU[UVVVV0W1WWWYYY߻ڻ h 'CJh256CJ h25CJ hMCJ h26h2 h25 h26CJ h25CJ h2CJ h25CJ h2CJG%G&G,G-G:GEGFGPGlGmGYSSSSSSSS$Ifkd$$Iflr |) 04 la mGxGGGGGGG HjHHH&ICIIIIJ JGJ{JJJJKKK?LXLL$IfLLLLLM0M1M?M[MYSSSSSSSS$Ifkd5$$Iflr |) 04 la [MsMMMMMM N?N@NNNNNNNNOO,O-O.O/OXOO$IfOOOOOOOOOOYSSSSSSSS$Ifkd$$Iflr |) 04 la OOOP%PDPOPPPlPxPPPPPPPPPPQKQQQQ\R]RyRRRR$IfRRRS*SBS_SSSS-TTTTTTT UYU[UmUUUUU"V#VAVpV $$Ifa$$IfpVVVVVVW+W?WWWWWWWWaXcXXYY Y@YYYpYYY $$Ifa$$IfY YYYYY'Z(ZWZZZZZZZN[O[V[s[}[[\\^-^d_t___`````?Zh256CJ h2CJ h25CJh2 h26CJ h25 h25CJ hxCJ h2CJ hS"CJL׈؈&'YSSSSSSSS$Ifkd)$$$Iflr)5  @  04 la^ '<Ylx(:;z܊8[|$If&ߌWUUUUUOOO$Ifkd%$$IflNr)5  @  04 la^ 9Z[\etSkd%$$IflrTHi*5 !   04 la$If ؍ٍ@]$FXӏԏ֏׏<Z| $$Ifa$$If|̐͐ϐА9Xw‘ $$Ifa$$If0YSSSSSSSS$Ifkd&$$IflrTHi*5 !   04 la 012DEXYzӒ0Meݓ=V~˔ $$Ifa$$If˔;Tޕ>Zsܖ0Ji˗՗ $$Ifa$$IfZ[sij˗ !8N/ "#<JN֞CEh2h256CJ h26CJ h2CJ h25CJ*՗֗ YSSSSSSSS$Ifkd'$$IflrTHi*5 !   04 la  !578LMNo͘0B#=>`av $$Ifa$$If8_ݛ ÜJKMNg< $$Ifa$$If<[֞؞ٞDEJHHkd[($$IflrTHi*5 !   04 la $$Ifa$$If,P/ =!"#$`% ,P/ =!"#`$`% 3 0&PP/ =!"#`$% 0&PP/ =!"#`$% 3 0&PP/ =!"#`$% 3 0&PP/ =!"#`$% 6 0&P0P= /!`"#`$`% $$If^!vh5 5T5\ 5T#v #vT#v\ #vT:V l05 5T5\ 5T4a^$$If^!vh5 5T5\ 5T#v #vT#v\ #vT:V l05 5T5\ 5T4a^$$If^!vh5 5T5\ 5T#v #vT#v\ #vT:V l05 5T5\ 5T4a^$$If^!vh5 55 5T#v #v#v #vT:V l05 55 5T4a^$$If^!vh5 55 5T#v #v#v #vT:V l405 55 5T4a^f4$$If^!vh5 55 5T#v #v#v #vT:V l405 55 5T4a^f4$$If^!vh5 55 5T#v #v#v #vT:V l05 55 5T4a^$$If!vh5|5F5j5#v|#vF#vj#v:V l05|5F5j54$$If!vh5|5F5j5#v|#vF#vj#v:V l05|5F5j54$$If!vh5|5F5j5#v|#vF#vj#v:V l05|5F5j54~$$If!vh5#v:V l054T~$$If!vh5#v:V l054T~$$If!vh5#v:V l054T~$$If!vh5#v:V l054T$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l05 54$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l05 54$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l05 54$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l 05 54$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l05 54$$If!vh5f5N 5\ 5X#vf#vN #v\ #vX:V l05f5N 5\ 5X4$$If!vh5f5N 5\ 5X#vf#vN #v\ #vX:V l05f5N 5\ 5X4$$If!vh5f5N 5\ 5X#vf#vN #v\ #vX:V l05f5N 5\ 5X4$$If!vh5f5N 5\ 5X#vf#vN #v\ #vX:V l05f5N 5\ 5X4$$If!vh5f5N 5\ 5X#vf#vN #v\ #vX:V l05f5N 5\ 5X4$$If!vh5f5N 5\ 5X#vf#vN #v\ #vX:V l05f5N 5\ 5X4$$If!vh5f5N 5\ 5X#vf#vN #v\ #vX:V l05f5N 5\ 5X4$$If!vh5f5N 5\ 5X#vf#vN #v\ #vX:V l05f5N 5\ 5X4$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l05 54$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l05 54$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l05 54$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l05 54$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l405 54f4$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l05 54$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l05 54$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l05 54$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l05 54$$If!vh5 5555#v #v:V l4 05 54f4$$If!vh5X5:5#vX#v:#v:V l05X5:54$$If!vh5X5:5#vX#v:#v:V l05X5:54$$If!vh5X5:5#vX#v:#v:V l05X5:54$$If!vh5X5:5#vX#v:#v:V l405X5:54f4$$If!vh5X5:5H#vX#v:#vH:V l05X5:5H4$$If!vh5X5:5H#vX#v:#vH:V l05X5:5H4$$If!vh5X5:5H#vX#v:#vH:V l05X5:5H4$$If!vh5X5:5H#vX#v:#vH:V l05X5:5H4$$If^!vh55 5 5@ 5 #v#v #v #v@ #v :V l055 5 5@ 5 4a^$$If^!vh55 5 5@ 5 #v#v #v #v@ #v :V l40+55 5 5@ 5 4a^f4$$If^!vh55 5 5@ 5 #v#v #v #v@ #v :V l40+55 5 5@ 5 4a^f4$$If^!vh55 5 5@ 5 #v#v #v #v@ #v :V l055 5 5@ 5 4a^$$If^!vh55 5 5@ 5 #v#v #v #v@ #v :V l40+55 5 5@ 5 4a^f4$$If^!vh55 5 5@ 5 #v#v #v #v@ #v :V l40+55 5 5@ 5 4a^f4$$If^!vh55 5 5@ 5 #v#v #v #v@ #v :V l055 5 5@ 5 4a^$$If^!vh55 5 5@ 5 #v#v #v #v@ #v :V lN055 5 5@ 5 4a^$$If!vh55 5! 5 5 #v#v #v! #v #v :V l055 5! 5 5 4$$If!vh55 5! 5 5 #v#v #v! #v #v :V l055 5! 5 5 4$$If!vh55 5! 5 5 #v#v #v! #v #v :V l055 5! 5 5 4$$If!vh55 5! 5 5 #v#v #v! #v #v :V l055 5! 5 5 48@8 Normal_HmH sH tH H@H Heading 1$$@&a$5CJtH uH@H Heading 2$$@&a$5CJtH u@@@ Heading 3$@& CJtH uB@B Heading 4$@&5CJtH uDAD Default Paragraph FontVi@V  Table Normal :V 44 la (k(No List :>@: Title$a$5CJtH u<B@< Body Text5CJtH u "7$kklE.\Â-7qr"3MN]n"#45GHhKLMNms0>XYZu"3MNj ,->Xf%Iklm~)*+,KQpwxy  / 0 1 4 5 =    H I J K U -  ]   ZM+?@ABCh uvwx*V8`ajk6IJGM NO()*89a)8 3=>cdefg[. p q r !!!!!<"=">""##h#i#r########$$$$$$$$0$1$2$d${$$$$$%<%=%\%]%%%%%&&4&k&l&n&o&&&&&&'('u'v'x'y''''((6(((((((((((((((((( ),)G)W)))*7*8*m****Q+R+T+U++++ ,f,g,i,j,,-d-e-f-h-i-t-z-{----------------.u........./I/////////0@0]0~0000000 11^11111123242:2;2G2H2I2J2T2U2V2W2r2s2t2u22222`33333444N445 5 55L5a5{55'6)6*6=6k6667O7Q7R7S7777777888&8'8(8)8*8+8,8-8.8/808182838485868788898:8;8<8=8>8?8@8A8B8C8D8E8F8G8H8I8J8K8L8M8N8O8P8Q8R8S8T8U8V8W8X8Y8Z8[8\8]8^8_8`8a8b8c8d8e8f8g8h8i8j8k8l8m8n8o8p8q8r8s8t8u8v888$9-9J9c9}999999999999 ::@:W::::;;7;Z;[;;;;;/<G<b<}<<<<<<=-=G=`=z==== >%>B>y>>>>?%?&?,?-?:?E?F?P?l?m?x??????? @j@@@&ACAAAAB BGB{BBBBCCC?DXDDDDDDE0E1E?E[EsEEEEEE F?F@FFFFFFFFGG,G-G.G/GXGGGGGGGGGGGGGH%HDHOHPHlHxHHHHHHHHHHIKIIII\J]JyJJJJJJK*KBK_KKKK-LLLLLLL MYM[MmMMMMM"N#NANpNNNNNNO+O?OOOOOOOOaPcPPQQ Q@QYQpQQQQ(RRRRRRS0SNSOSUSVSrSsS}SSSSSSS TWToTTTTTT*U@UUUUUVV-VeVVVVVVVWdWtWWWWX/XJXXXXXXXXXXX Y YY!Y"YZs܎0JiˏՏ֏  !578LMNo͐0B#=>`av8_ݓ ÔJKMNg<[֖ٖؖDG000800r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r 0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r000 0 0 0 0 0 0  0 0  0  0  0 0 0 0  0  0 0 0 0 0 0 0  0 0  0  0  0 0 0 00?0?0?0?0?d000 0  0 0000000808080800x0x0x 0 x 0x 0x0x0x 0x0x0x0x0x 0x 0x 0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x 0x 0x0x0x0x0x0x0x 0x 00000000000000000000000 0 0000 0 0 0 00000 00 0 0000000>"0>"0>"0>"0>" 0>" 0>" 0>" 0>" 0>" 0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>" 0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>" 0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>" 0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>" 0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>" 0>" 0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>" 0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>" 0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>" 0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>" 0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>" 0>" 0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>" 0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>" 0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>" 0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"0>"